Quantum Threat Mitigation in Blockchain AI Architectures
Keywords:
Quantum Threat Mitigation, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Blockchain AI, Hybrid QKD, Lattice-Based SignaturesAbstract
Blockchain AI architectures stand at the nexus of distributed consensus and machine-driven intelligence, offering transformative applications across finance, supply chain, healthcare, and beyond. However, the emergence of scalable quantum computers threatens foundational cryptographic primitives—most notably, elliptic-curve and RSA-based schemes—that secure transaction integrity, key exchange, and smart-contract execution. This manuscript presents a comprehensive evaluation of quantum threat mitigation strategies tailored for blockchain AI systems. We examine three distinct approaches: (1) adoption of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms (lattice-based signatures and hash-based KEMs) that resist Shor’s algorithm; (2) integration of hybrid quantum-classical key distribution leveraging quantum key distribution (QKD) combined with classical post-quantum algorithms; and (3) deployment of trusted execution environments (TEEs) to isolate critical key operations from both classical and quantum side-channel attacks. Our mixed-methods methodology includes simulation on a 50-node blockchain AI testbed, processing 240,000 transactions over 24 hours, and statistical analysis of throughput, latency, and key-exchange performance. The results demonstrate that lattice-based schemes maintain 128-bit quantum security with a moderate performance overhead (~27 % throughput reduction, ~20 % increased latency), while hybrid QKD delivers information-theoretic security but incurs significant latency penalties (115 % higher than baseline). TEEs effectively mitigate side-channels with negligible additional overhead. We conclude by offering practical guidelines for phased deployment—beginning with immediate migration to lattice-based cryptography, followed by pilot QKD integration for high-security use cases—and outline future research directions.
Downloads
References
• Aggarwal, D., Brennen, G. K., Lee, T., Santha, M., & Tomamichel, M. (2017). Quantum attacks on Bitcoin, and how to protect against them. Ledger, 3, 68–90.
• Alagic, G., Apon, D., Bellen, R., Benfield, J., Bernstein, D. J., Berbain, C., … & Zhang, L. (2020). Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process (NISTIR 8309). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
• Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (1984). Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175–179.
• Bernstein, D. J., Buchmann, J., & Dahmen, E. (Eds.). (2009). Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer.
• Chen, L. K., Jordan, S., Liu, Y. K., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., … & Smith-Turner, R. (2016). Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography (NISTIR 8105). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
• Kiktenko, E. O., Trushechkin, A. S., & Yunusov, R. (2018). Post-quantum security of quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information, 4(1), 28.
• Liu, F., Chen, M., & Zhang, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence in blockchain security: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 10, 115351–115371.
• Mosca, M. (2018). Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: Will we be ready? IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(5), 38–41.
• Rahman, M. H., Shahriar, S., & Hossain, M. S. (2021). Performance evaluation of post-quantum signatures in blockchain. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 58, 102757.
• Sabt, M., Achemlal, M., & Bouabdallah, A. (2015). Trusted execution environment: What it is, and what it is not. In 2015 IEEE Trustcom/ISPA (pp. 57–64). IEEE.
• Shor, P. W. (1994). Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring. In Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (pp. 124–134). IEEE.
• Wang, Y., Li, C., & Liu, J. (2022). An AI-based approach to attack prediction in quantum-resistant blockchain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 291–303.
• Yao, W., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Yi, P., & Yang, F. (2021). Quantum-safe blockchain: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(4), 2507–2525.
• Zhang, Y., & Lee, W. (2021). Blockchain security: A survey. Computers & Security, 107, 102270.
• Guan, Q. F., et al. (2023). Hybrid quantum-classical AI architectures for secure blockchain consensus. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 180, 12–25.
• Kh urana, V., & Szalachowski, P. (2021). Quantum-safe distributed ledger technologies: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access, 9, 10023–10038.
• Liu, X., Jiang, P., Chen, T., Luo, X., & Wen, Q. (2020). A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 108, 841–865.
• Martin, A., & Shepherd, G. (2020). Quantum internet and secure blockchain: A new paradigm. Proceedings of the IEEE, 108(11), 1870–1893.
• Singh, N., & Kumar, A. (2023). Future directions in quantum-resistant blockchain AI integration. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 212, 103460.
• Kiktenko, E. O., & Nikitin, P. P. (2018). Information-theoretic security in QKD-backed blockchain networks. Quantum Science and Technology, 3(4), 045004.
• Rahman, M. H., & Hossain, M. S. (2021). Comparative analysis of post-quantum KEMs in distributed ledgers. International Journal of Network Security, 23(5), 894–908.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 World Journal of Future Technologies in Computer Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







