Federated Data Processing Architectures for Secure Cross-Organization Analytics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63345//wjftcse.v2.i2.201

Keywords:

Federated Data Processing , Cross-Organization Analytics , Federated Learning , Privacy-Preserving Computing , Secure Multi-Party Computation , Differential Privacy

Abstract

The growing volume of data generated across enterprises, healthcare institutions, financial organizations, research centers, and government agencies has created significant opportunities for cross-organization analytics. Collaborative analysis of distributed datasets can improve decision-making, predictive modeling, operational efficiency, and scientific discovery. However, traditional centralized data-sharing approaches often face substantial challenges related to privacy protection, regulatory compliance, data ownership, cybersecurity risks, and organizational trust. Regulations such as GDPR and other data governance frameworks further restrict the unrestricted movement of sensitive information across institutional boundaries. Federated data processing architectures have emerged as a promising solution to these challenges by enabling organizations to collaboratively perform analytics and machine learning while keeping data locally stored. Instead of transferring raw datasets, federated systems exchange model parameters, aggregated statistics, or encrypted computations, thereby reducing privacy risks and enhancing data security. Recent advances in federated learning, secure multi-party computation, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and secure aggregation have strengthened the feasibility of secure cross-organization analytics. This study evaluates a federated data processing architecture for secure cross-organization analytics using a simulated multi-organization experimental setup. The findings indicate that federated approaches significantly improve privacy preservation, regulatory compliance, and data utilization while maintaining analytical accuracy. The study highlights current challenges related to scalability, communication overhead, interoperability, and trust management, and identifies future research directions for building secure, efficient, and scalable federated analytics ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. ACM CCS.

• Brisimi, T. S., Chen, R., Mela, T., Olshevsky, A., Paschalidis, I. C., & Shi, W. (2018). Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 59–67.

• Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

• Liu, Y., Fan, T., Chen, T., Xu, Q., & Yang, Q. (2021). FATE: An industrial grade platform for collaborative learning with data protection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(226), 1–6.

• Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SecureML: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 19–38.

• Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., et al. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119.

• Sheller, M. J., Reina, G. A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., & Bakas, S. (2019). Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data. BrainLes 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

• Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., et al. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10, 12598.

• Vepakomma, P., Gupta, O., Swedish, T., & Raskar, R. (2018). Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient data. arXiv.

• Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), Article 12.

• Bater, J., Park, Y., He, X., Wang, X., & Rogers, J. (2020). SAQE: Practical privacy-preserving approximate query processing for data federations. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 13(12), 2691–2705.

• Durrant, A., Markovic, M., Matthews, D., May, D., Enright, J., & Leontidis, G. (2022). The role of cross-silo federated learning in facilitating data sharing in the agri-food sector. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193, 106648.

Published

2026-05-12

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Federated Data Processing Architectures for Secure Cross-Organization Analytics. (2026). World Journal of Future Technologies in Computer Science and Engineering (WJFTCSE) U.S. ISSN: 3070-6203, 2(2), May (60-68). https://doi.org/10.63345//wjftcse.v2.i2.201

Similar Articles

11-20 of 98

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.